How badly did CNN get the election?

"Trump's ghost will haunt the GOP -- and possibly kill it"

"It's all over for Donald Trump"

This was a column penned by a chief CNN political analyst and historian about 4 weeks before the election. He mocked Trump's upcoming landslide defeat in the election, encouraged Hillary Clinton to redirect some of her campaign funds to Congressional races, predicted a takeover of the Senate by the Democrats, and speculated about a small chance that the Democrats could take back the House and strip Paul Ryan of his position as Speaker of the House.  And he declared the Republican Party as being dead (again) and would be living in the shadow of Trump's ghost for the near future.

Of course in the actual election:

1. Trump won the presidential election by a considerable margin.
2. Hillary Clinton spent every dime of her $2 billion campaign budget (the largest in world history) and still lost.
3. The Republicans maintained their majority in the Senate, 51-48.
4. The Republicans maintained their majority in the House, 239-193.
5. The Republicans grew their majority of governorships from 31-18-1 to 34-15-1.

So practically overnight, we went from nearly every political pundit predicting Democratic takeover of the White House, Senate, and governorships and a collapse of the Republican Party to the GOP winning the White House, Senate, House, and governorships.

CNN shows election bias with victory margin language

CNN said tonight on TV that Republican Scott Walker "narrowly defeats" Democrat Tom Barrett with only a 57%-42% win. That's odd because back in November '08, CNN called Obama's 53%-46% an "overwhelming victory".

Wow. The English language sure changed a lot in 3 1/2 years!

The video has since been removed.

But other sites have picked up on this too, including The PJ Tatler and ConservativeFact.com.

Compare that to CNN’s Obama victory article in November 2008.